{"id":149079,"date":"2026-05-11T08:00:11","date_gmt":"2026-05-11T12:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/?post_type=articles&#038;p=149079"},"modified":"2026-05-07T10:37:27","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T14:37:27","slug":"how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness","status":"publish","type":"articles","link":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/","title":{"rendered":"How L&#038;D Leaders Can Measure Team Effectiveness"},"author":52,"featured_media":149082,"template":"","tags":[3749,32764,2771],"class_list":["post-149079","articles","type-articles","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-ld-strategy","tag-performance-metrics","tag-team-effectiveness","global_topic_tax-measurement-and-analytics","global_topic_tax-performance-management"],"acf":{"sponsored":false,"gated":false,"gated_content_type":"","file_attachment":null,"gated_content":"","form_instruction_header":"To access the full article, please fill out the form below:","pardot_html_embed":"","author_override":true,"author_name":"Kimberly Luffman","author_image":149081,"author_bio":"Kimberly Luffman is a leadership and team performance consultant with Brave Insights and the creator of <a href=\"https:\/\/team-hive.co\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">TeamHive, an evidence-based team effectiveness diagnostic<\/a>, developed in partnership with the University of Newcastle.","excerpt":"Organizations struggle to improve teams because they measure individuals instead of the behaviors that actually drive team effectiveness.","main_content":"I've spent a lot of time in rooms with teams that aren't working. Sometimes it's a leadership team where decisions don't stick. Sometimes it\u2019s a project team where the same issues keep resurfacing in different forms. And almost always, by the time someone calls me, an investment has already been made \u2014 usually in the leader. Coaching, a 360, a leadership program. Often more than one.\r\n\r\nIn my work with organizations, I\u2019ve often found that these investments don\u2019t lead to meaningful improvements in team effectiveness or culture. It\u2019s not because the training is poorly designed. The problem is more fundamental: We keep trying to improve teams by working on the people who lead them, while treating the team itself as something downstream that will improve as a result. Research has been telling us for some time that this isn't quite how it works.\r\n<h2>Why Most Workplace Measurement Misses the Team<\/h2>\r\nMost organizations have no shortage of measurement: engagement surveys, pulse checks, manager 360s, performance scorecards, culture dashboards. And yet when a team is genuinely struggling, none of it gives us much insight into what\u2019s really going wrong.\r\n\r\nThat\u2019s because the tools we rely on weren't built to measure team effectiveness.\r\n\r\nEngagement surveys measure how individuals feel about the organization. A team can score well on engagement and still function poorly in how it makes decisions or handles disagreement. Manager 360s measure individual leader behaviors, which is useful when you're developing the leader, but tells you very little about how the team around them operates. Performance metrics tell you what got delivered, but not why \u2014 and two teams with the same output can have very different levels of connection, support and learning.\r\n\r\nWhen the unit we want to improve is the team, but every tool we use is built to assess individuals, it\u2019s no surprise that team development conversations often stay vague. Organizations invest heavily in team development (team days, strategy days, social events), but rarely measure team effectiveness in a structured or meaningful way.\r\n<h2>The PLUS Model: 4 Factors That Distinguish High-Performing Teams<\/h2>\r\nSome of the most useful work in this space has come from researchers like <a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2009\/05\/why-teams-dont-work\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Richard Hackman<\/a> and Ruth Wageman, Eduardo Salas, and <a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2008\/07\/the-competitive-imperative-of-learning\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Amy Edmondson<\/a>, whose have spent their careers asking the same question from different angles: What do high-performing teams do that other teams don't?\r\n\r\nThe answers are more consistent than I expected when I first started reading the research seriously. Working in partnership with the University of Newcastle, my colleagues and I synthesized this evidence base, plus learnings from our own decades-long experience working with teams, into about 200 items. We surveyed 500 working professionals, and factor analysis led us to a four-factor model we call PLUS \u2014 <strong>P<\/strong>urpose, <strong>L<\/strong>earning, <strong>U<\/strong>nity, and <strong>S<\/strong>hared leadership. Each factor reflects a behaviorally grounded construct that predicts team effectiveness. More importantly, each one is observable, measurable and developable.\r\n\r\n<strong>Purpose<\/strong> is the first. Not the kind that gets printed on a wall, but the kind team members can articulate in similar words to each other on a Tuesday afternoon. When I ask members of a team why they exist and get five different answers, that tells me more than most of their key performance indicators (KPIs). <a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/232479593_The_Influence_of_Shared_Mental_Models_on_Team_Process_and_Performance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Research<\/a> on shared mental models, particularly Salas and colleagues, has consistently linked alignment on purpose to better coordination and performance under pressure.\r\n\r\n<strong>Learning<\/strong> is the second \u2014 the willingness and ability to share what's working, surface what isn't, and adapt together. In our validation research, this cluster of behaviors emerged as the single strongest predictor of team effectiveness across the sample. It echoes what Edmondson and others have been writing about for two decades, going back to her <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.2307\/2666999\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1999 study<\/a> of work teams in a manufacturing setting that established the link between psychological safety, learning behavior and team performance.\r\n\r\n<strong>Unity<\/strong> is the third \u2014 what I'd describe as constructive unity. It includes psychological safety, but it's broader than that. It's the ability to disagree productively, give and receive direct feedback, and to be honest about how things are actually going. Google's <a href=\"https:\/\/rework.withgoogle.com\/intl\/en\/guides\/understand-team-effectiveness\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Project Aristotle<\/a> reached a similar conclusion, identifying psychological safety as the strongest differentiator between its highest- and lowest-performing teams.\r\n\r\n<strong>Shared leadership<\/strong> is the fourth. Teams that distribute decision-making and accountability across members \u2014 rather than concentrating both in the manager \u2014 tend to be more agile, resilient and sustainable. This is uncomfortable news for organizations that have invested heavily in leader-centric development, but it's where the evidence points. Meta-analytic <a href=\"https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/record\/2013-38206-001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">research by Wang, Waldman and Zhang<\/a> found shared leadership to be a strong predictor of team performance, particularly in complex and interdependent work.\r\n<h2>Measuring PLUS in Practice<\/h2>\r\nThis is where the practical work begins. Measuring team effectiveness well requires a different approach from the engagement and 360 surveys most L&amp;D leaders are used to. Here are a few principles to consider:\r\n\r\n<strong>The unit of analysis is the team, not the individual.<\/strong> A team-level diagnostic asks every member to rate the team's behaviors rather than their own. Results are reported at the team level, typically as averages and ranges across the dimensions, never individually. This shifts the conversation from \"who is doing what well or poorly\" to \"what patterns are showing up in how we work together?\"\r\n\r\n<strong>Stakeholders should be included where possible.<\/strong> Teams don't operate in isolation, and the gap between how a team sees itself and how customers, partners or sponsors experience it often reveals the most useful insights. Multi-source feedback surfaces blind spots that internal-only diagnostics often miss.\r\n\r\n<strong>The data has to belong to the team.<\/strong> The moment a team thinks a diagnostic is being used to evaluate their manager or feed into performance reviews, candor disappears. But when the team owns the data and is responsible for interpreting it, something different happens. People get curious. They challenge the results. They start having conversations they should have had much earlier.\r\n\r\nWhatever instrument you use to <a href=\"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wiki\/measurement-and-analytics\/training-diagnostics\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">diagnose<\/a> team effectiveness, the question to ask is simple: Does it measure team behavior in a way the team can meaningfully engage with, and does it include feedback from people outside the team as well as within in?\r\n<h2>Before and After: Using Diagnostics to Evaluate Team Development<\/h2>\r\nOne of the most underused applications of team measurement is also one of the most valuable: measuring a team before an intervention and then measuring again after it.\r\n\r\nMost team development programs are evaluated, if they are evaluated at all, through participant satisfaction and self-reported learning. That information is useful but limited. It tells us how people felt about the experience, not whether the team\u2019s behavior has changed.\r\n\r\nA pre- and post-diagnostic changes that. By measuring PLUS (or another evidence-based framework) before the intervention, designing training around the team\u2019s weakest areas and then measuring again six to nine months later, the data reveals what changed, what didn't and where the team still needs to focus.\r\n\r\nTwo things tend to happen when L&amp;D teams adopt this approach. First, the program design becomes more targeted. There is little value in running a generic team workshop when the real issue is clearly shared leadership or lack of purpose. Second, the conversation with sponsors becomes much stronger. Instead of asking them to trust the process, you can show them what changed.\r\n\r\nThis is also where team development fits more credibly into the broader L&amp;D evaluation conversation. Kirkpatrick's levels have always been difficult to apply to team-level outcomes. A validated team diagnostic gives us a more direct way to measure behavior change where it happens: in the team.\r\n<h2>What Makes Measurement Translate Into Change<\/h2>\r\nMeasurement alone doesn't change anything. I've seen plenty of teams receive a beautifully produced diagnostic report and continue working exactly as they did before. Here are a few tips that make the difference between insight and actual change:\r\n\r\n<strong>Specificity matters.<\/strong> \"We need to work on communication\" is too vague to act on. \"Our stakeholders consistently rate us lower than we rate ourselves on raising issues early\" gives a team something concrete to address.\r\n\r\n<strong>Ownership matters more.<\/strong> Teams that interpret and act on their own data \u2014 with support, but without being told what to do \u2014 engage more deeply and sustain change longer.\r\n\r\n<strong>And it has to be repeated.<\/strong> Team effectiveness isn't a project you finish. The teams that improve are the ones that return to the same questions every six to 12 months, look at what has changed and decide what to work on next.\r\n<h2>A Reframe for L&amp;D<\/h2>\r\nI'm not suggesting we stop developing leaders. Leaders still need to grow, and strong leadership still matters enormously. But we've been quietly assuming that team performance is mostly a reflection of leader capability, and the evidence doesn't support that as strongly as many of us would like.\r\n\r\nA meaningful share of the performance leaders are held accountable for sits in the collective behavior of the team around them. If we're not measuring or developing that directly, we're leaving one of the biggest performance levers untouched.\r\n\r\nTeam development, taken seriously, is its own discipline \u2014 with its own research base, its own tools and its own design principles. For those of us in L&amp;D, the next step is to treat it that way and give team development the same rigor we\u2019ve long given individual development.\r\n\r\nThe good news is that when teams are given the chance to take ownership of how they work together, they usually do.","full_width":false,"content_band":[{"acf_fc_layout":"social_callout","blockquote":"Organizations invest heavily in team development, but rarely measure team effectiveness in a structured or meaningful way"},{"acf_fc_layout":"content_area","wysiwyg":"[hubspot type=\"form\" portal=\"47185625\" id=\"a4646b39-7619-4495-85fb-a740879fc15c\" version=\"v4\"]"}],"tice_sponsors":"","custom_dfp_keywords":""},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.8 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Why Measuring Team Effectiveness Matters<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Most organizations measure individuals, not teams, limiting performance gains and missing key drivers of team effectiveness and culture.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How L&amp;D Leaders Can Measure Team Effectiveness\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Most organizations measure individuals, not teams, limiting performance gains and missing key drivers of team effectiveness and culture.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Training Industry\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TrainingIndustry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@TrainingIndustr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/\",\"name\":\"Why Measuring Team Effectiveness Matters\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-11T12:00:11+00:00\",\"description\":\"Most organizations measure individuals, not teams, limiting performance gains and missing key drivers of team effectiveness and culture.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"People standing around and talking to one another.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/measurement-and-analytics\\\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Articles\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"How L&#038;D Leaders Can Measure Team Effectiveness\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Training Industry\",\"description\":\"Articles, research and tools for the L&amp;D professional. Insights for managing the business of learning.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Training Industry, Inc\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/training_industry_logo_stacked_RGB1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/training_industry_logo_stacked_RGB1.png\",\"width\":371,\"height\":113,\"caption\":\"Training Industry, Inc\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/trainingindustry.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/TrainingIndustry\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/TrainingIndustr\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/trainingindustr\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/training-industry-inc-\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/TrainingIndustry\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Measuring Team Effectiveness Matters","description":"Most organizations measure individuals, not teams, limiting performance gains and missing key drivers of team effectiveness and culture.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How L&D Leaders Can Measure Team Effectiveness","og_description":"Most organizations measure individuals, not teams, limiting performance gains and missing key drivers of team effectiveness and culture.","og_url":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/","og_site_name":"Training Industry","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TrainingIndustry\/","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1000,"url":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@TrainingIndustr","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/","url":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/","name":"Why Measuring Team Effectiveness Matters","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-11T12:00:11+00:00","description":"Most organizations measure individuals, not teams, limiting performance gains and missing key drivers of team effectiveness and culture.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/5.11.26-Measurement-2208976877.jpg","width":1920,"height":1000,"caption":"People standing around and talking to one another."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/measurement-and-analytics\/how-ld-leaders-can-measure-team-effectiveness\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Articles","item":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"How L&#038;D Leaders Can Measure Team Effectiveness"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/","name":"Training Industry","description":"Articles, research and tools for the L&amp;D professional. Insights for managing the business of learning.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/#organization","name":"Training Industry, Inc","url":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/training_industry_logo_stacked_RGB1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/training_industry_logo_stacked_RGB1.png","width":371,"height":113,"caption":"Training Industry, Inc"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TrainingIndustry\/","https:\/\/x.com\/TrainingIndustr","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/trainingindustr\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/training-industry-inc-","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/TrainingIndustry"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles\/149079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/articles"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/52"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles\/149079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":149248,"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles\/149079\/revisions\/149248"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/149082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trainingindustry.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}